Tarho and psychology? What between them can be connection? From one side is psychology, officially confessed science, getting this status in the XIX century, having ancient roots and being conceived yet in the days of Hippocrates, Plato and Aristotle (300-400 to н. э.). From other is Tarho, that is official and it was publicly confessed in the XIX century (coincidence?), but unofficial history of confession leaves roots аж in the I century to our era, when mentioned first criteria and forms, becoming part of structure of Tarho. It turns out that age of origin, and also a presence or absence of public confession can not serve as reason to that, to acknowledge or reject one or another point of view, expressed in form certain conception. So what will help to understand and right estimate compatibility or incompatibility of Tarho and psychology?