A conversation about siege writing is necessary at least to testify: already during the siege disaster, a huge, multi-purpose and multi-genre work of literature was carried out to describe, understand, and reflect the siege experience. By restoring this work today, we turn to the task of creating a language in which someone who has not lived through it, but who is responsible for it and does not want it to be completely forgotten, can speak about the blockade. Studying the work of the siege poets, we see that they were looking for a language that would quench the pain of the victim of history and capture history, trying to reconcile these distant tasks.