It is necessary to clarify a few points. This book, of course, despite the presence of a large number of artistic elements, is not artistic. The same as journalistic or fiction. It could probably be called, to some extent, mystical, if not for one nuance - there is not an ounce of “mysticism” in it, but only the result of long and hard work, as they used to say, on oneself. Or rather, working on your abilities to perceive and study “mysticism” in general. Moreover, this work is aimed exclusively at developing one’s own abilities and increasing one’s own capabilities, but not at manipulating others. I was once told that I need to write more briefly. Maybe someone does that. But I believe that this approach has a right to exist if you are writing lecture notes. Any full-fledged book, first of all, should be interesting and full - so that the reader can enjoy different forms and methods of presentation, and artistic images. Therefore, I do not write too briefly, as I could if I wanted, but I fill my articles with various images - solely to make it more interesting to read. Which, however, does not in any way affect their filling with precisely the practical “mystical” information that I considered necessary to place there.