Dear martyrs of articles, hostages of pledges and pioneers of presence! Those of you who have already studied the German language before (or are doing so now), from time to time had to (or are still obliged to) to one degree or another come across the standard grammar of the German language, which has certainly delivered (or will still deliver) more than once ) he had a lot of difficulties and long, happy hours spent motionless reading smart books in the hope of penetrating the mysterious world of the indefinite article, the incomprehensible plusquaperfect and the completely mysterious conditionalis II. And at the same time, for you, who are diligently struggling with the mystery of the formation of the passive with the help of the auxiliary verb werden + some participle II of a certain main verb, normative grammar evoked a difficult-to-overcome desire to speak out about it using non-normative lexical constructions with increased support associated with them idiomatic phrases. It seems to you that you understand absolutely nothing about these conjugations (changing a verb according to persons) and declensions (changing, for example, a noun according to cases), and you curse the innocent Germans, who, however, are with your points of view are still guilty - at least in the fact that they, solely to spite you, invented all these preterites (past tense), presents (present tense) and the impersonal phrase es gibt (to have), which, even if it were wrong, always requires an indefinite after itself ¬ny article + Akkusativ.