Nowadays, many people read summaries to find out what a film or book will be about and do not suspect that summaries often quite erroneously, if not falsely, convey the introduction, deliberately or not deceiving the hopes of the one who reads the summary. And therefore, often expecting revelation, we are given rubbish, but we ourselves bypass works that could become masterpieces in our eyes. Therefore, I consider annotations to be an evil, albeit an inevitable one. There used to be text here that said little about what would be in the book. Now there will be no more. But maybe it’s a little clearer. What is my book about? It tells about a different point of view - on the phenomena around us, on our views on life, on what we consider important, and what we have already lost the habit of noticing. From such little things as hyperspace, the transformation of matter and even magic, to the basic laws of the world, such as time itself - there will be a different point of view on many things, but not on everything... There are no huge descriptions of objects of special importance that are awarded only the fact that someone passes by them once. In it, the reader is given the maximum opportunity to imagine the world being described, and is given the very minimum of details, which are intended to emphasize only those nuances that I consider important. It contains a minimum of incomprehensible metaphors. But what is and will be in it are explanations, so deep that someday I will get to the structure of the world created by me, we will consider its foundations and what is smaller than the smallest atoms and even their components. But will anyone be interested... guessing is not my destiny.